Tennis courts

Don’t Destroy Stratford Trees For New Tennis Courts

I am writing to protest against the removal of trees caused by a city proposal for four concrete tennis courts at Longbrook Park in Stratford.

This project should not have advanced this far in the approval process without public comment before the zoning commission, public works, conservation or city council – I’m not aware of any given opportunity. There are two clay tennis courts on Residential Prim Street in Longbrook Park (the older population often prefers clay to concrete) and eight hard courts in Short Beach. These 10 courts are all unplayable as the surfaces are loaded with deep cracks or endless weeds. The city doesn’t look after the land it has in our public parks, so does it really make sense to pay an outside contractor around $ 750,000 to build new ones?

The current quantity and diversity of the city’s courts is sufficient to serve the tennis player population, but since all those in the parks are unplayable, we are in a self-sustaining debacle that the city proposes to “fix” by destroying the park. oak and maple. trees that will take about 30 years for replacements to reach comparable height and girth.

If Stratford High School tennis players need courts, the Short Beach Eights are ideal – there is enough to share with the public, no residential properties are nearby, and evening play could be encouraged as no one will be disturbed by properly directed lights or noise.

Preserving the fragile ecosystem we have is worth far more than pouring 500 cubic meters of concrete to replace the irreplaceable, especially when there are readily available alternatives. Maintain the good times we have and leave the trees alone.

Tucker hunting


Source link